导航:首页 > 融资信托 > 公司融资方面的英文文献综述

公司融资方面的英文文献综述

发布时间:2024-05-26 09:23:09

A. 求一篇 关于 企业融姿问题的 国外文献 3000字左右就行 国外的期刊什么的都行 要有作者之类的 在线等

中小企业融资问题研究文献综述

国外研究现状

国外对中小企业融资研究目前主要是从两个方面进行来进行的:一是从企业自身结构特点出发,从企业资本结构角度来进行,虽然其研究对象以大企业居多,但对中小企业也具有很强的理论意义;二是从中小企业对资本的需求角度。

资本结构理论

所谓资本结构是指企业各种资本的构成和比例关系,是企业融资决策的核心问题。而企业也在致力于寻找最佳资本结构,以期达到企业市场价值最大化。西方资本结构理论也主要是围绕如何形成最佳资本结构展开的,其发展过程大致分为连个个阶段,即早期资本结构理论和现代资本结构理论。

早期的资本结构理论

企业的目标是实现企业市场价值最大化,企业市场价值一般是由权益资本价值和债务资本价值组成,在企业息税前利润一定的情况下,总资本成本率最低意味着企业市场价值最大化。于是美国的经济学家大卫﹒杜兰特(D.Durand,1952)提出的早期的资本机构理论,他将资本机构理论分为净收益理论、净营业收益理论和传统理论(也称为折衷理论)。净收益理论是以权益资本总可以获取固定不变的收益率且企业总能够以一个固定利率筹集到全部债务资金为假设前提,该理论认为债务资金总是有利的,当企业负债率达到100%时,就可以满足债务资本成本和权益资本成本加权平均资本成本最小化,实现企业市场价值最大化。净营业收益理论是以总资本成本率和负债成本率都是固定不变的为假设前提,该理论认为,无论财务杠杆如何变化,企业加权平均资本成本都是固定的,企业总价值不发生任何变化,企业价值和资本结构不相关,企业不存在最佳资本结构问题。传统理论也就是折衷理论则是介于净收益理论和净营业收益理论之间的资本结构理论,该理论认为,企业的资本成本并不独立于资本结构以外,企业确实存在一个最佳的资本结构,即在加权平均成本由下降转为上升的拐点上,并且这个资本结构可以通过财务杠杆的运用来实现。从上面可以看出,这三个理论均不够成熟,净收益理论重视财务杠杆效应而忽略了财务风险,净营业收益理论则过分的夸大了财务风险,折衷理论则忽略了负债比率同权益资本成本之间的关系。

现代资本结构理论

早期的资本结构理论建立在经验推断的基础上,没有经过科学的数学推导和数据统计支撑,不够成熟,在实践中会产生偏差。而以MM定理为代表的现代资本结构理论的出现,则使得资本结构理论的研究向前跨出了一大步。

(1)MM定理。Modigliani&Miller于1956年在计量经济学年会发表了论文《资本成本、公司财务和投资理论》,后来又发表在《美国经济评论》上,论文上面所提的理论被称为MM定理。MM定理的提出被认为是早期的资本结构理论和现代结构理论的分水岭,也是现代资本结构理论的基石。MM定理在一系列严格假设的条件下,例如完善的资本市场,无公司税和个人所得税等等,经过一系列严格的数学推导,该定理证明,在一定条件下,企业价值与他们所采取的融资方式无关,即无论发行股票还是债券,对企业价值没有影响。该定理前提假设恨苛刻,与现实情况明显不符合。

Modigliani&Miller于1963年又发展了他们的理论,放松了没有企业所得税的假设,修正后的MM定理认为,由于债务融资的免税特性,负债率越高的企业将使用越多的债务,即债务的“税盾效应”,企业最佳资本结构即为100%的负债,企业可以通过利用政策来改变其资本结构从而改变市场价值。

Miller(1997)建立了一个包括公司所得税和个人所得税在内的模型,分析了负债对企业价值的影响,分析了负债对企业价值的影响,得出了个人所得税在某种程度上抵消了利息的减税作用但并不会完全抵消的结论。该结论与Modigliani&Miller提出的修正的MM定理是一致的。但是他们有着相同的缺陷,都将债券融资放在最优先的位置,而忽略了债务的风险和额外的费用增加,与现实经济不符合。

Ang(1991,1992)对中小企业的税盾效应进行了研究,他认为,中小企业一般缺乏此类动机,因为,一方面中小企业大多采取独资和合伙组织形式,公司税和个人所得税紧密结合在一起;而另一方面,弱化的有限责任也使得破产成本至少在局部上依附个人,由于盈利性逊于大企业,中小企业较少使用债务融资的税盾效应(Prttit&singer.1985),而从负债的成本来看,一般认为中小企业面临着更大的破产可能性,因此比大企业使用较少的债务融资。

(2)静态权衡理论。MM定理只考虑了债务融资的税盾效应,而没有考虑其所带来的风险和额外费用。本杰明﹒格雷厄姆(1934)在其《有价证券分析》一书中指出,以法律规定的税率纳税,当财务危机可能性不大时,一个价值最大化的企业将不会有税盾效应,然而进行实证分析发现,增加负债率,这些企业就会增加7.5%的收入。

1984年,Myers在MM定理的基础上进一步指出:企业的高负债的增加,使得企业固定费用增加,收益下降,从而企业财务面临的风险越大,财务风险的增大产生了破产成本和代理成本两类成本。企业选择什么样的资本结构取决于他要达到的目标,其中包括在负债的收益和成本之间进行取舍,我们称之为静态权衡理论。最优的资本结构即为负债的免税利益和财务风险带来的成本之间相互平衡的资本融资结构。

1990年,Mackie-mason估计了一个公司优序租赁股份的发行的概率模型,她指出,低边际税率的企业(比如具有递延税收损失的公司),与那些面对固定税率的更具有盈利性的公司相比更倾向于发行股份,Mackie-mason的结果与权衡理论相一致,因为它说明了赋税企业偏好负债。

(3)优序融资理论。1984年,Myers&Mujluf在其名篇《vestorsDoNotHave》中,根据信号传递的原理推出了他们的优序融资假说。其假设条件是:除信息不对称外,金融市场是完全的。其认为,公司偏好于内部融资,如果需要外部融资,公司将首先发行最安全的证券,也就是说,先债务后权益。如果公司内部产生的现金流超过其投资需求,多余现金将用于偿还债务而不是回购股票。随着外部融资需求的增加,公司的融资工具选择顺序将是:从安全的幅务到有风险的债务,比如从有抵押的高级债务到可转换债券或优先股,股权融资是最后的选择。

1989年Baskin以交易成本、个人所得税和控制权的研究角度对优序融资理论作出了解释,指出由于留存收益提供的内部资金不必承担发行成本,也避免了个人所得税,因此内部资金要优于外部资金。与权益性资金相比较,负债融资由于具有节税效应,发行成本低,又不会稀释公司的控制权,所以对外融资来说负债融资又优于权益性融资。

(4)信号理论。最早将信号引入经济学中的是MichaelSpence,他认为尽管市场中存在着信息不对称现象,但是潜在的交易收益依然可以实现。

Ross(1977)从信息传递的角度分析,最早将非对称信息引入MM理论模型,分别假设公司的未来收益服从连续型和离散型的分布。假定经理人了解投资收益的分布函数,而投资人不了解,建立了融资结构的信号传递模型。企业经理人对融资方式的选择向投资者传递了信号。一般来说破产的概率是和公司的质量负相关而与负债水平正相关。破产将给经理人带来损失。因而经理人不会盲目增加负债,在低质量的公司无法通过更多的债权融资来模仿高质量公司的情况下。外部投资者把较高的负债水平作为高质量的一个信号。所以,投资者将企业发行股票融资理解为企业资产质量的恶化,而债务融资则是一种企业资产运作良好的信号,负债率上升表明经营者对企业未来收益有较高的期望,传递了经营者对企业的信心,进而使投资者对企业也充满信心,进而使企业市场价值随之增大。

(5)代理理论。代理理论是指企业内部和外部投资者之间潜的冲突决定着最优的资本结构,即企业要在代理成本和其他融资成本之间进行取舍。

1976年Jensen&Meckling开创了代理成本理论,即代理理论、企业理论和财产所有权理论来系统地分析和解释信息不对称下的企业融资结构问题的学说,Jensen&Meckling把代理关系解释为委托人授予代理人某些决策权而同时又要求代理人为其提供利益的服务关系。例如公司中所有权与控制权分离而引起的资本所有者与经营者的关系就属于代理关系。由于经营者不是企业的完全所有者(存在外部股权),经营者的工作努力使他承担了全部成本却只能获取部分收益。而当他在职消费时,他却得到了全部的收益却只需承担部分成本。如果委托人和代理人都追求利益最大化,那么代理人就不会总是根据委托人的利益来采取行动的。也就是说经营者将不会努力工作,却热衷于在职消费,这将导致企业的价值小于管理者为企业完全所有者时的价值,这个差额就是外部股权的代理成本,简称股权代理成本。在投资总量和个人财产给定的情况下,增加债务融资的比例将会增加经营者的股权比例,进而降低外部股权的代理成本。但债务融资又会引起另一种代理成本。因为作为剩余索取者,经营者将更倾向于从事高风险项目。如果成功的话,经营者可以从中获取成功的收益;而一旦失败,他便借助有限责任制度将失败的损失推给债权人。经营者的这种行为给企业带来的损失就是债权融资带来的代理成本,即债权代理成本。在对股权代理成本和债权代理成本进行分析的基础之上,Jensen&Meckling认为,均衡的企业所有权结构是由股权代理成本和债权代理成本之间的平衡关系来决定的,当两种融资方式的边际代理成本相等的时候,使得总的代理成本达到最小,进而企业便可以实现最佳资本结构。

(6)控制权理论。控制权理论主要是从企业经营者对控制权本身的偏好角度探讨了资本结构问题,主要反映了企业通过对资本结构中负债和股权结构的选择而对公司治理结构效率的影响程度。该理论认为,企业融资结构在决定企业收入分配的同时,也决定了企业控制权的分配。也就是说,公司治理结构的有效性在很大程度上是取决于企业融资结构的。

Harris&Raviv,主要探讨Jensen&Meckling所提出的所有者与经营者之间利益冲突所引发的代理成本问题,他们分别用静态和动态两个模型说明了经营者在通常情况下是不会从所有者的利益最大化出发的,因而有必要对经营者进行监督,他们认为债务融资有利于强化公司治理结构中的监督和约束机制。

Aghion&Bolton于1992年将不完全契约理论引入到融资结构的分析框架,并对债务契约和资本结构之间的关系展开研究。他们认为,在多次博弈的过程中,当出现不容易得到的收益信息时,将控制权转移给债权人是最优的。

Davidsson(1989)在对瑞典中小企业所有者、管理者样本进行分析得出了中小企业增长最重要的是“预期金融回报”和“独立性的增长”。当中小企业扩张与独立发展发生矛盾时,所有者会保持企业的独立性为重。可见控制权在中小企业融资中是很重要的因素。

中小企业对资本的需求角度

国外从中小企业对资本的需求角度,对中小企业融资问题所作的研究很多,大概主要有以下两个方面:一是微观层面上,企业自身成长周期对资本的需求,以及企业所面临的融资困境角度;二是宏观经济层面,货币政策,银行业合并以及结构化调整等。

1.微观层面

(1)企业金融成长周期理论。资本结构理论主要是指企业融资结构问题,并没有考虑到企业不同发展阶段所不同的融资特点,也没有动态的研究企业融资方式的选择对资本结构安排有什么影响。企业金融成长周期理论弥补了这方面不足。

Weston&Brigham(1970)根据企业在不同成长阶段融资来源的变化提出了企业金融成长周期理论,并将企业的成长周期分为初期、成熟期和衰退期三个阶段。Weston&Brigham对该理论进行了扩展,将企业的金融成长周期分为六个阶段,即创立期、成长阶段Ⅰ、成长阶段Ⅱ、成长阶段Ⅲ、成熟期和衰退期,并根据企业的资本结构、销售额和利润等显性特征说明了企业在不同发展阶段的融资来源情况,从长期和动态的角度较好地解释了企业融资结构变化的规律(见下表)

Berger&Udell(1998对Weston&Brigham的企业金融成长周期理论进行了修正,即将信息约束、企业规模和资金需求等作为影响企业融资结构的基本因素并引入到他们所构建的企业融资模型中,通过分析得出以下结论:在企业成长的不同阶段,随着信息约束、企业规模和资金需求等约束条件的变化,企业的融资结构也会发生相应的变化。在企业生命周期的不同阶段,需要进行不同的融资安排。

(2)企业融资困境方面

早在20世纪30年代初,英国议员Macmillan在向英国国会提供的关于中小企业问题的调查报告中就指出,中小企业融资面临着“金融缺口”,即著名的“麦克米伦缺口”。Macmillan发现,中小企业的长期资本供给存在短缺,这种短缺尤其明显地发生在那些单靠初始出资人的资金已经不敷运用,但规模又尚未达到足以在公开市场上融资的企业身上。“麦克米伦缺口”产生的主要原因是市场的失灵,即市场的力量无法使资金向中小企业流动。在市场经济条件下,金融机构也要追求自身利益的最大化,当中小企业无力从金融市场获得直接融资时,只有从银行获得间接融资。和大企业相比,中小企业融资渠道狭窄,所以银行贷款成为中小企业获得资金的唯一途径。这就使得银行具有相对的借贷优势。

1981年Stiglitz&Weiss发表了《不完全信息市场中的信贷配给》之后,信息不对称被公认为是造成中小企业融资困难的主要原因。Stiglitz认为,信贷配给源于信贷市场存在信息不对称,并由此导致了信贷合约中的道德风险问题。此问题的发生是基于商业银行不具备监督借款者的能力、借款人与贷款人利益不一致性以及他们之间事前的信息不对称这三个主要因素。

Bester(1982)引入了贷款抵押甄别机制,提出了低风险的企业承诺较高的抵押水平而享受较低的贷款利率,而高风险企业则相反,以此缓解信息不对称带来的不利影响。Strahan、Weston(1996)提出了匹配理论,即银行对中小企业的贷款与银行的规模成较强的负相关性。

Berger&Udell(1998)发现,解决信息不对称的问题,成为中小企业融资过程中的关键。而关系型借贷被视为银行和企业双方在关系导向下达成的一种合意合约。如果借、贷者之间保持一种长期的关系,则有利于贷款人获得借款者的相关信息。如:借款者在贷款期限内生产经营状况,其产品市场占有率变化情况,借款者的还款的意愿及能力,是否需要抵押品以及是否需要签订有其他附加条件的合约等。

Uzzi&Gillespie(1999)认为,与中小企业贷款直接关联的贷款员,可能较其他人掌握更多的关于中小企业的权威信息。这些贷款员与中小企业主和其雇员保持着长期的关系,了解企业在当地的运行情况和企业的市场份额,甚至该贷款员就生活在当地的社区中。因此对中小企业及其所有者的财务状况非常了解,对其当前及未来的绩效有着比较准确的认识。

2.宏观层面

(1)银行业合并及结构调整对中小企业融资影响

一般认为,银行业合并后形成的金融机构不仅规模会增大,组织结构会更复杂,行为方式也会发生变化,而这些变化通常不利于关系型贷款的开展。

Strahan(1998)认为小银行合并之初,多样化使得合并后的银行抗风险能力增强,从而能够向中小企业提供更多的贷款,但随着规模的进一步扩大,银行开始有能力向大企业提供贷款,并且内部管理也越来越复杂,所以银行对中小企业的贷款比率就会下降;相反,小银行被大银行兼并时,新成立的银行则会减少对中小企业的贷款;同样,当大银行之间发生兼并时,对中小企业的贷款也会减少。

Peek&Rosongren发现大银行对小银行的合并或大银行之间的合并倾向于减少对中小企业的贷款。Berger进一步指出银行业并购对中小企业贷款存在4种潜在效应:静态效应、重组效应、直接效应和外部效应。

Sharpe认为,市场力量使银行能够加强它与小企业的隐性长期合约关系,小企业从长远打算,会倾向于和银行保持长期关系。因为企业转换“基础”银行的沉淀成本相对较高,所以当银行与企业保持较长时期的关系后,银行就有可能使企业支付高于完全竞争时期的利率水平,使以前吸引小企业的短期低利率补贴部分得到补偿。Peterson和Rajan的研究发现,当银行的市场力量增加时,信用级别相对较低的小企业也有可能获得贷款支持。

(2)宏观经济政策对中小企业的影响

货币政策主要有两个传导渠道:货币渠道和信贷渠道。货币渠道指货币政策通过改变利率,进而影响经济部门的真实支出。信贷渠道则又分两种,一种为银行贷款渠道,另一种为资产负债表渠道。银行贷款渠道是指,货币紧缩伴随着银行储备的减少,进而导致贷款供给的减少。。资产负债表渠道是指,货币紧缩通过提高利率损害到企业抵押品的价值,降低企业信用等级,进而削弱了企业获取贷款的能力。因此货币政策改变对中小企业的影响冲击更大。

Gertler和Gilchrist在对制造业小企业的经验研究中发现,小型制造业企业不仅直接对利率反应敏感,而且还深受经济周期的间接影响,因此,货币紧缩对小企业的影响要远大于对大企业的影响。

Taylor指出,金融自由化不会导致资金供给总量的增加,因为利率提高只会使得资金供给从非正规部门转向正规部门,总的借款额不会出现净的增加。Steel认为,由于较高的交易成本和风险、抵押品的缺乏以及历史渊源等,使得小企业在获取正规部门的贷款时仍将面临着诸多的限制。如果放开金融管制,金融自由化将会使得中小企业的融资环境更加恶劣。

国内研究现状

目前国内学术界关于中小企业融资问题的研究主要从三个方面进行研究:第一,关于国内中小企业融资渠道方式的选择及相关实证研究;第二,关于国内中小企业融资所面临困境原因以及相应对策的研究;第三、国际上中小企业融资在操作层面上经验介绍以及比较研究。

1、贺力平(1999)认为,妨碍我国银行机构扩大对中小企业信贷支持的主要因素是银行机构缺乏企业客户风险方面的足够信息,从而不能做出适用的风险评级并提供相应的信贷服务,指出可以通过发展非国有金融机构和转变国有金融机构的经营方式来解决贷款者与中小企业借款者之间的信息不对称问题.

2、周业安实证分析了我国金融抑制政策对企业融资能力的影响,分析表明:信贷市场的利率管制、价格和数量歧视导致了企业的过度负债、逆向选择、寻租等现象,浪费了信贷资源;资本市场的行政管制则增加了企业的直接融资成本。

3、樊纲研究员(1999)认为,银行对中小企业的惜贷原因主要是政府一直没有采取发展非国有银行的政策所致。所以作者提出要积极地发展非国有银行。同时为避免人们的‘市场选择’扭曲,提出对非国有银行的存款人提供与国家银行同等的社会担保。

4、张杰认为,民营经济的金融困境源于国有金融体制对国有企业的金融支持和国有企业对这种支持的刚性依赖,以及由此形成的信贷资本化。他认为,解除民营经济金融困境的根本出路在于营造内生性金融制度成长的外部环境。

5、陈晓红教授(2000)指出:由于大部分的中小企业自身素质差、财力物力有限、设备落后陈旧及生产的都是属于卖方市场的终端产品,而非生产与大企业相配套的中间产品和服务,经营效益随着买方市场的形成和竞争的加剧而变得较差。基于风险和利润的考虑,国有商业银行信贷资金大量向大企业集团倾斜,使中小企业信贷资金严重不足,为解决这种资金关系的不协调,作者认为应从三个方面解决中小企业的融资问题:第一重构商业银行与中小企业的关系,建立中小企业的主办银行制;第二建立政策性中小银行;第三大力发展非国有商业性中小银行。

6、魏开文博士(2000)认为,我国市场型的银行和中小企业关系的模式应该是一种契约型的主办银行关系。这种关系模式是建立在市场经济基础上的,用市场经济的一般规则来规范银行和中小企业的行为,并体现契约型的信用关系。

7、林毅夫(2001)、李永军从我国劳动力丰富、资本稀缺的要素禀赋出发,认为我国中小企业进行直接融资的成本较高,企业规模的限制决定了采取编制公开财务报表上市要承担巨大的信息成本;而在间接融资中,大企业在经营活动的透明性、抵押及贷款规模效应等方面原因,大型金融机构更偏好对大企业的贷款。而与大型金融机构所不同的是,中小金融机构比较愿意为中小企业贷款,而从企业的技术类型看,中小企业以劳动密集型为主,解决中小企业融资困难唯一的方法是大力发展中小金融机构。

8、白钦先、薛誉华(2001)指出我国由于长期实行赶超战略,强调规模经济的观点占据了政策层的主导地位,忽视了中小企业在经济发展中的比较优势,认识上的差距导致长期

以来中小企业融资难的问题没有得到较好的解决。

9、杨思群教授(2002)在对国外中小企业与银行关系的研究基础上,认为我国中小企业和银行之间存在“惜贷”、信贷的可歧视性、非长期关系、支付体系及中小金融机构等问题。提出我国银行和企业间问题的缓解思路是:银行“惜贷”一方面是反映中小企业素质及信用程度低的问题,另一方面反映了银行在信贷文化、重视资产的安全性方面有了积极的变化,所以“惜贷”只能是作为短期的特殊环境下采取的临时措施,而从长期看,为保障信贷资产的安全稳定运行,银行必须提高信息的分析能力和信贷担保技术;对于中小企业和银行之间的非长期关系上,建立中小企业的主办银行制;在支付体系上,中小企业存在“多头开户”现象,这不利于银行对中小企业的运营情况和信用状况的了解,所以要减少这种现象并提高银行小额支付体系的效率;在中小金融机构上,片面强调国有化和国有控股,使中小金融机构存在着公司治理结构不良、预算约束不强等体制方面的弊端,为克服这一弊端,需按市场化的准则设立和监管中小企业,同时鼓励中小金融机构在整和过程中进行市场化的兼并和重组。

10、张捷教授(2003)通过银行组织结构与中小企业的关系型借贷特点来说明中小银行对中小企业融资的特殊性意义。关系性贷款的基本前提是银行和企业之间必须保持长期、紧密相对封闭的交易关系,即企业固定地与数量极少的(通常一到两家)银行打交道。由于关系型贷款不拘泥于企业能否提供合格的财务信息和抵押品,因而最适合资产抵押品较少的中小企业。也就是说,中小银行在收集和处理公开硬信息(如企业财务数据、信用编码等)处于劣势,但由于其地域性特点,它们通过与中小企业保持长期密切的近距离接触而获得各种非公开的关联信息,具有向信息不透明的中小企业发放关系型贷款优势。由于软信息传递存在成本问题,会在银行内部产生代理问题。与大银行相比,小银行科层结构简单,代理链条短,代理成本也相应地就低。

理论研究不足及以后研究方向

虽然说企业融资理论经过多年的发展已经相对较为成熟,但是,中小企业融资需求理论在很多问题上尚未达成一致的意见,各种实证检验也经常会得出完全不同的结果。这充分说明小企业的多样性和复杂性使其融资需求理论还远不够完善,还有相当多的问题和争论有待于进一步地解释。尤其在我国,中小企业融资无论是在理论研究还是在实际运作方面,都还处于起步阶段,我国经济形势复杂,今年以来温州,鄂尔多斯相继发生的高利贷崩盘现象,充分的体现了中小企业融资困难的问题,值得我们深思。

对于中小企业融资发展方向,应该是多学科交叉,例如将博弈论以及行为经济学加入到中小企业融资问题研究中去,可能会有一定程度的突破。



B. 融资英文文献

融资英文文献(6000字左右 ) 作者:Justin.Athur.winner。 Commercial Financing Solutions - Think Outside The Bank
July,2007 by Stephen Bush
Commercial financing borrowers are likely to feel that a traditional bank is their best source for business financing. However, because most traditional banks focus on a small number of established instries, non-traditional (non-bank) and non-local commercial lenders should be considered for most commercial financing situations. Therefore the recommended commercial financing strategy (as discussed in this article) is to Think Outside the Bank”.
There are several commercial financing situations in which commercial borrowers will frequently find that non-traditional commercial lenders are better positioned to provide terms that are more advantageous to the commercial borrower: (1) Business cash advance and credit card factoring programs; (2) commercial mortgage loans; and (3) credit card processing programs. In some cases a traditional bank will offer to provide commercial financing but will attach excessively stringent terms and covenants. In other cases a traditional bank will decline the commercial financing outright, perhaps because they do not even provide business financing to the commercial borrower’s particular instry. In either case, the commercial borrower is likely to benefit by Thinking Outside the Bank”.
As I noted in an earlier commercial financing article, in many non-competitive business financing situations it is not unusual for a local traditional bank to impose harsher commercial financing terms than would typically be seen in a more competitive business financing market. Such traditional banks routinely take advantage of a relative lack of other commercial lenders in their local market. An appropriate response by commercial borrowers is to seek out non-bank commercial financing options. It is neither necessary nor wise for commercial borrowers to depend only upon local traditional banks for commercial financing solutions. For most commercial financing situations, a non-local and non-bank commercial lender is likely to provide improved business financing terms because they are accustomed to competing aggressively with other commercial lenders.

COMMERCIAL FINANCING EXAMPLE ONE - THINK OUTSIDE THE BANK
Business Cash Advance and Credit Card Receivables Programs

Most businesses that accept credit cards in their business will qualify for a business cash advance with their credit card receivables. Traditional banks will typically be very poor candidates to consider if a business needs assistance with credit card factoring and business cash advances. Because even thriving businesses frequently need more cash than they can borrow from a bank, it can be of critical importance for a business to Think Outside the Bank” and locate non-traditional lenders to assist with this commercial financing need.

COMMERCIAL FINANCING EXAMPLE TWO - THINK OUTSIDE THE BANK
Commercial Mortgage Loans

Two of the most common commercial financing difficulties experienced by commercial borrowers can be avoided if they Think Outside the Bank”. The first commercial financing situation is the prevailing practice of traditional banks to avoid most special purpose properties (such as funeral homes and churches). The second commercial financing situation is the typical practice of most commercial banks to attach balloon and/or recall provisions to their commercial loans (which means that the bank can require early repayment of the commercial loan under various conditions). Both of these undesirable commercial financing situations can usually and easily be avoided by considering a non-traditional and non-bank lender.

COMMERCIAL FINANCING EXAMPLE THREE - THINK OUTSIDE THE BANK
Credit Card Processing Programs

The choice of an appropriate credit card processing service can be instrumental in improving the profitability of businesses with a high volume of credit card activity. The analysis of credit card processing providers can be effectively combined with the credit card factoring and credit card receivables process described above. In assessing a business cash advance program, it is frequently possible to simultaneously arrange for a substantial improvement in the merchant’s credit card processing program. Because traditional banks are usually not competitive in providing assistance with credit card factoring, it is equally likely that a non-traditional lender will be the primary source of effective and competitive help with credit card processing.

A closing commercial financing thought: I have written an earlier commercial financing article about commercial lenders to avoid. It should be noted that there are in fact both traditional and non-traditional (non-bank) lenders which should be avoided. So when commercial borrowers Think Outside the Bank”, it is still of critical importance that they are prepared to avoid a wide variety of problematic non-traditional commercial lenders in their search for viable commercial financing, especially when it involves business cash advance (credit card receivables and credit card factoring) programs, credit card processing services and commercial real estate financing.

商业融资解决方案-比如银行外
2007年7月由Stephen布什
商业融资的借款人可能会认为,传统的银行是他们的最佳来源的商业融资。然而,由于大多数传统银行侧重于少数设立工业,非传统(非银行)和非本地商业银行应考虑大多数商业融资的情况。因此,建议商业融资战略(如本文中讨论)是跳出本行“ 。
有几个商业融资情况下,商业借款人常常发现,非传统的商业银行将能够更好地提供的条件更有利的商业借款人: ( 1 )商业透支现金和信用卡保理业务程序; ( 2 )商业按揭贷款;和( 3 )信用卡处理程序。在某些情况下,传统的银行将提供商业融资,但附加条件过于严格和盟约。在其他情况下,传统的银行将下降彻底的商业融资,这可能是因为他们甚至不提供商业融资,商业借款人的特定行业。在这两种情况下,商业借款人可能会受益于银行外思考“ 。
正如我在较早的商业融资的文章,在许多非竞争企业融资情况下,它并没有什么不寻常的地方传统的银行实行更加严厉的商业融资条件比通常被视为在一个更具竞争力的企业融资市场。这种传统的银行通常利用相对缺乏其他商业银行在其当地市场。作出适当的反应是由商业借款人寻求非银行的商业融资方案。这是既无必要,也明智的商业借款取决于只有在当地传统的商业银行融资解决方案。对于大多数商业融资的情况下,非本地和非银行的商业银行有可能提供更好的企业融资条件,因为他们所熟悉的竞争积极与其他商业银行。

商业融资比如-比如银行外
企业现金和信用卡应收帐款程序

大多数企业认为接受信用卡将在其业务资格的商业现金透支的信用卡应收款。传统的银行通常会是非常贫穷的候选人,以考虑是否需要援助业务与保理业务和信用卡业务现金垫款。因为即使是蓬勃发展的企业往往需要更多的现金,他们可以比银行贷款,它可以是极其重要的商业银行外的思考“ ,并找到非传统的贷款,以协助这个商业融资的需要。

商业融资两名-比如银行外
商业按揭贷款

两个最常见的商业融资遇到困难的商业贷款,可避免如果他们认为银行外“ 。第一商业融资情况是普遍存在的做法,传统的银行,以避免最特殊用途性质(如殡仪馆和教堂) 。第二商业融资的情况是典型的做法,大多数商业银行的重视气球和/或召回规定的商业贷款(这意味着银行可以要求提前偿还的商业贷款不同条件下) 。这两种不良商业融资的情况,通常可以很容易地避免和审议了非传统和非银行贷款。

商业融资例3 -比如银行外
信用卡处理程序

选择一个适当的信用卡处理服务,可有助于改善企业的盈利与大量的信用卡活动。分析信用卡处理供应商,才能有效地结合信用卡保理业务和信用卡应收款上述进程。在评估企业现金透支程序时,它常常是有可能同时安排大大提高商家的信用卡处理程序。由于传统的银行通常是没有竞争力,在提供援助信用卡保理业务中,也同样可能是一个非传统的贷款将是主要来源的有效和有竞争力的帮助,信用卡处理。

闭幕商业融资认为:我已经写的早期商业融资文章商业银行,以避免。应当指出的是,事实上,传统和非传统(非银行)贷款,应加以避免。因此,当借款人跳出商业银行“ ,它仍然是至关重要的,它们准备,以避免各种问题的非传统的商业银行在寻求可行的商业融资,尤其是当它涉及业务现金透支(信用卡应收款和信用卡保理)程序,信用卡处理服务和商业房地产融资。

C. 急求一篇关于中小企业融资的英文文献,要有中文翻译

Automatically translated text:
The definition of lease financing
Finance leases (Financial Leasing) also known as the Equipment Leasing (Equipment Leasing), or modern leasing (Modern Leasing), and is essentially transfer ownership of the assets of all or most of the risks and rewards of the lease. The ultimate ownership of assets to be transferred, or may not transfer.

It refers to the specific content of the lessee to the lessor under the lease object and the specific requirements of the supplier selection, vendor financing to purchase rental property, and the use of leased to a lessee, the lessee to the lessor to pay instalments rent, the lease term lease ownership of objects belonging to the lessor of all, the tenant has the right to use the leased items. Term expired, and finished the lessee to pay rent under the lease contract financing to fulfil obligations in full, leasing objects that vesting ownership of all the lessee. Despite the finance lease transactions, the lessors have the identity of the purchase of equipment, but the substantive content of the purchase of equipment suppliers such as the choice of the specific requirements of the equipment, the conditions of the purchase contract negotiations by the lessee enjoy and exercise, lessee leasing object is essentially the purchaser. , Is a finance lease extension of loans and trade and technology updates in the new integrated financial instry. Because of its extension of loans and combination of features, there is a problem in leasing companies can recycling, treatment of leasing, and so the financing for the enterprise credit and secured the main requirement, it is very suitable for SME financing. In addition, the leasing of sheet financing, not reflected in the financial statements of the enterprise liability, does not affect the credit status of enterprises. This multi-channel financing needs of SMEs in terms of it is very beneficial.

Leasing and financing lease of a traditional nature of the difference is: traditional lease to the tenant leasing the use of objects of the time rent, and finance lease financing costs to the tenant occupying the time of rental. The market economy develops to a certain stage and the adaptation of a strong financing, in the 1950s in the United States have a new type of trading, as it adapted to the requirements of modern economic development, in the 60 to 70 the rapid development in the world, and today has become a business update equipment one of the main means of financing, known as the "sunrise instry." China in the early 1980s after the introction of this operational modalities for over 10 years has been the rapid development, compared with developed countries, the advantages of leasing is far from being played out, the market potential is huge.

[Edit] the main characteristics of the leasing
The main characteristics of the leasing is: the ownership of objects as leasing is the lessor in order to control the risk of the tenant rent reimbursement taken a form of ownership, at the end of the contract could eventually be transferred to the lessee, the lease purchase items from lease people choose, maintenance from the tenant responsible for the lessor to provide financial services only. Rent calculation principles are: to lease the lessor objects based on the purchase price, occupied by the lessee to the lessor of funds based on time, according to a mutually agreed rental rates. It is essentially dependent on the traditional leasing financial transactions, is a special kind of financial instruments.

[Edit] the type of lease financing
1. Simple financing lease

Financing lease is a simple, by the lessee choose to purchase the rental property, the lessor on the lease project through risk assessment after the rental lease to the lessee the use of objects. Throughout the lease period the lessee does not enjoy the right to use the title, and is responsible for repair and maintenance of leasing objects. The lessor's lease is good or bad thing without any liability, equipment depreciation in the tenant side.

2. Leveraged lease financing

Leveraged leasing practices similar to syndicated loans, is a specialized leasing to large-scale projects with the tax benefits of lease financing, mainly led by a leasing company as a trunk, and for the lease of a very large project financing. First set up a leasing company from the operation of the main institutions - a project-based fund management company set up projects to provide more than 20% of the total amount of funds, and the remaining part was the main source of funds banks and social absorb idle idle funds, the use of 100 percent enjoy low tax benefits "in the eight Bo" leverage for the leasing project large amount of funds. The remaining financing and leasing practices are basically the same, but because of the complexity of the contract covers a wide range and even greater. As can enjoy tax benefits, operating norms, comprehensive benefits, and recovery of rent safe, low-cost, and are generally used for aircraft, ships, communications equipment and large complete sets of equipment lease financing.

3. Commissioned by the Financial Leasing

Is a way to have the funds or equipment entrusted to non-bank financial institutions in the financing lease, the lessor is also the first client, the second is the trustee of the lessor at the same time. The lessor to accept the client's money or lease of the subject matter, according to the client's written by the client designated for the lessee of the leasing business. In the subject of the lease term lease of the property of the client, the lessor only charges, not to take risks. Such leasing commissioned a major characteristic is not to lease the right to operate the enterprise, "by the right" business. E-commerce is on the lease by lease rental as a business platform.

The second is the lessor or lessee commissioned by the lease purchase of a third person, the lessor under the contract to pay the purchase price, also known as commissioned by the lease purchase financing.

4. Project finance leasing

Lessee to project their own property and to ensure efficiency, and the lessor signed a finance lease contract, the lessor to the lessee of the property and other projects without recourse to the proceeds, we can only rent charged to the project's cash flow and profitability to determine. The seller (that is leasing goods manufacturers) through their holding leasing companies to promote their procts in this way, and expand market share. Communications equipment, medical equipment, transportation equipment, or even the right to operate highway can be used this way. Others, including the return of leasing, also known as sale and leaseback financing leasing; financing to leasing, also known as the financing to leasing.

[Edit] the risk of lease financing
Finance leases from the risk of many uncertain factors, is multifaceted and interrelated, in the full understanding of the operational activities of the characteristics of various risks can be comprehensive, scientific analysis of risks to formulate corresponding measures. The risk of financing leasing main categories as follows:

(1) proct market risks. In the market environment, regardless of the financing lease, loan or investment, as long as the funds used to purchase equipment or to carry out technological transformation, first of all, should consider leasing equipment procts market risks, which need to know to sell the procts, market share rate and occupancy, proct trends in the development of the market, the consumption structure and the mentality of the consumers and consumption capacity. If these factors are not fully understand, the survey are not careful, and may increase the market risk.

(2) financial risks. For the leasing of a financial nature, financial risks throughout the entire business activities. The lessor, the biggest risk is that the lessee is also rent capacity, it has a direct impact on the operation of leasing companies and survival, therefore, the risk of also rent from the project began, it should be cause for concern.

Currency also have risks, especially international payments, methods of payment, payment date, time, the remittance channels and means of payment options improperly, will increase the risk.

(3) Trade risk. For the leasing of a trade properties, the risks of trade negotiations to orders from the acceptance testing there is a risk. The merchandise trade in the modern development of a relatively complete, the community is also supporting the establishment of corresponding institutions and preventive measures, such as a letter of credit, transport insurance, commodity inspection, commercial arbitration and the risk of credit counseling have taken precautions and remedial measures, but because people's awareness and understanding of the risks of different degrees, and some means of a commercial nature, coupled with the inexperience of the management of enterprises and other factors, all of these instruments have not been used, making trade risk still exists.

(4) technical risks. One of the benefits of lease financing before other enterprises is the introction of advanced technology and equipment. In the actual course of the operation, or advanced technology, advanced technology is mature, mature technology for the legal rights and interests of others, is an important risk a technical reasons. Serious, e to technical problems so that equipment in a state of paralysis. Other risks include the economic environment, force majeure, and so on.

[Edit] the accounting treatment of lease financing
[Edit], the tenant on the accounting treatment of lease financing
1, the start of the lease accounting treatment

At the start of the lease, the tenant will usually be the start of the lease rental assets in the original book value of the minimum lease payments and the present value of the lower of the two leased assets as recorded value of the minimum lease payments as a long-term payables recorded value, and the difference between the two records is not recognised financing costs. However, if the assets of the leasing assets of the enterprise small proportion of the total, the tenant may be the start of the lease in the minimum lease payment records of assets and long-term rent payments. This time, the "proportional" not usually refers to fixed assets financed by leasing the lessee total assets total less than 30% (including 30%). Under such circumstances, rent for the financing of long-term assets and the determination of the amount e, the tenant may, at its option, which can be used minimum lease payments, and can also be used leasing assets in the original book value of the minimum lease payments and the present value of the two in the lower. Then what "leasing the original book value of assets" refers to the start of the lease rental, as reflected in the accounts, the book value of the leased asset.

Lessee in the calculation of the minimum lease payments at the current value, if the lessor that the interest rate implicit in the lease, the lessor should be used as the interest rate implicit in the discount rate, otherwise, shall be stipulated in the lease contract interest rate as the discount rate . If the lessor's interest rate implicit in the lease and rental rates stipulated in the contract are not available, it should be used over the same period interest rates on bank loans as the discount rate. Which is implicit in the lease rates, in the inception of the lease, the minimum lease payments and the present value of the unsecured portion of the resial value of the current value of assets and equivalent to the original book value of the discount rate.

2, the initial direct costs of the accounting treatment

Initial direct costs refer to the lease negotiations and the signing of the lease agreement occurred in the course of the lease can be directly attributable to the cost of the project. Lessee in the initial direct costs usually have stamp ty, commission, attorney fees, travel expenses, such as the costs of negotiations. Lessee in the initial direct costs should be recognised as an expense in the current period. Accounts for its handling: debit "management fees" and other subjects, credited to "bank" and other subjects.

3, no finance charge assessed

In the finance lease, the lessee to the lessor to pay the rent, include the repayment of principal and interest in two parts. Lessee to pay rent, on the one hand to rece long-term payables, on the other hand, while not confirmed by the leasing costs for a certain method to confirm the current financing costs, the first rent (that is, initially matching each rental payment) Under the circumstances, the lease term is the first phase of rent paid no interest, should only rece the long-term payments, not to confirm the current financing costs.

Not sharing in the finance costs, the lessee should be used to calculate certain way. According to the guidelines, the lessee can be used in real interest rates, the straight-line method can also be used and the number of years of combined law. In using the effective interest method, in accordance with the inception of the lease is a lease assets and liabilities are recorded based on the value of different financing costs assessment rate options are also different. No finance charge assessed specific divided into the following types:

(1), leasing assets and liabilities to a minimum lease payments accounted for the present value of value to the investor and the interest rate implicit in the lease for the discount rate. Under such circumstances, investors should be the interest rate implicit in the lease for the assessment rate.

(2), leasing assets and liabilities to a minimum lease payments for the present value of recorded value, and to lease contract provides for the interest rate as the discount rate. In such circumstances, should be stipulated in the lease contract as the rate of assessment rates.

(3), leasing assets and liabilities to the original book value of the leased asset accounted for the value of the lessee does not exist resial value guarantees and preferential purchase right to choose. In such circumstances, should be re-calculation of the cost-sharing rate financing. Financing cost-sharing rate refers to the inception of the lease, the minimum lease payments equal to the present value of lease assets in the original book value of the discount rate. In the lessee or related to the leased asset resial value of the third-party security situation, and the similar, the end of the lease, not recognised all the financing costs should be shared End, and lease liabilities should also be reced to zero.

(4), leasing assets and liabilities to the original book value of the leased asset accounted for the value of the lessee does not exist guaranteed resial value, but there is preferential option to purchase. In such circumstances, should be re-calculation of the cost-sharing rate financing. At the end of the lease, not recognised all the financing costs should be shared End, and lease liabilities should also be reced to zero.

(5), leasing assets and liabilities to the original book value of the leased asset value accounted for, and the existence of the lessee guaranteed resial value.

Under such circumstances, the cost-sharing should be re-financing rate. Related to the lessee or third parties on the resial value of leased assets as security has been provided or not at the end of the lease renewal and to pay a penalty of circumstances, the end of the lease, not recognised all the financing costs should be shared End, and lease liabilities should also be reced to the guaranteed resial value, or to be paid by the breach.

Lessee shall pay each of the rent shall be the amount of rent paid, debit "long-term payables - to finance leases," subjects, credited to "bank" subjects, if payment of rent, which includes compliance costs, At the same time debit should be "manufacturing costs", "management fees" and other subjects. At the same time should be recognized in accordance with the current amount of the finance charge, debit "financial costs" subjects, credited the "no finance charge" subjects.

4, the leased asset depreciation Provision

Tenants should finance the lessee Provision for depreciation of fixed assets, should address two main issues:

(1), depreciation policy

Provision for asset depreciation, lease, the tenant should be its own assets Provision line depreciation method. If the lessee or third parties relating to the leased asset security has been provided, should be credited for the amount of depreciation on fixed assets, and the inception of the lease accounting resial value after decting the value of the balance. If the lessee or third parties relating to the leased asset resial value of the security has been provided, the total amount of depreciation should be credited for the start of the lease value of fixed assets recorded.

(2), the depreciation period

Identify the leased asset depreciation period, should be in accordance with the lease contract. If reasonable certainty that the lessee at the end of the lessee will obtain ownership of the leased asset, the lessee can be identified with all of the assets of the remaining useful life, and should therefore be the start of the lease to lease the remaining useful life of assets as depreciation period; If you can not reasonably determine whether the lease to the lessee at the end of the lease ownership of the assets to be made to the lease period and the remaining useful life of the leased asset in the shorter of the two as the depreciation period.

5, the accounting treatment of compliance costs

Many types of compliance costs, rent for the financing of fixed assets improved expenditure, technical advice and service charges, fees should be increased staff training credited to the extension of sharing costs, debit "long-term prepaid expenses," and "accrued expenses" , "manufacturing costs", "management fees" and other subjects, the fixed assets regular maintenance, insurance, etc. can be directly charged to expense in the current period, debit "manufacturing costs," and "operating expenses" and other subjects, credited to "bank deposits, "wait until the subjects.

6, or the accounting treatment of rent

Since the rent or the amount of uncertainty, unable to adopt a rational approach to its system for sharing, in the actual event, debit "manufacturing costs," and "operating expenses" and other subjects, credited to "bank" and other subjects.

7, at the end of the lease accounting treatment

At the end of lease, the tenant on the lease is usually the disposition of the assets of three circumstances:

(1), the return of the leased asset. Debit "long-term payables - to finance leases," and "accumulated depreciation" subjects, credited "fixed assets - fixed assets financed by leasing all" subjects.

(2), renewable lease concession assets. If the lessee to exercise the right to choose renewable concession, the lease shall be deemed to have been made the presence of the corresponding accounting treatment. If no expiry of renewal, to the lessor under the lease contract to pay a penalty, debit "operating expenses" subjects, credited to "bank" and other subjects.

(3), stay purchase the leased asset. In the lessee enjoy preferential purchase right to choose, purchase price paid, debit "long-term payables - to finance lease," credited "bank" and other subjects at the same time, will be fixed assets from "all fixed assets financed by leasing" Details Details of the other subjects into subjects.

字数太多,翻译另答~~~~~~

D. 急求一篇关于中小企业融资的英文文献,字书10000字左右,万分感谢

Automatically translated text:
The definition of lease financing
Finance leases (Financial Leasing) also known as the Equipment Leasing (Equipment Leasing), or modern leasing (Modern Leasing), and is essentially transfer ownership of the assets of all or most of the risks and rewards of the lease. The ultimate ownership of assets to be transferred, or may not transfer.

It refers to the specific content of the lessee to the lessor under the lease object and the specific requirements of the supplier selection, vendor financing to purchase rental property, and the use of leased to a lessee, the lessee to the lessor to pay instalments rent, the lease term lease ownership of objects belonging to the lessor of all, the tenant has the right to use the leased items. Term expired, and finished the lessee to pay rent under the lease contract financing to fulfil obligations in full, leasing objects that vesting ownership of all the lessee. Despite the finance lease transactions, the lessors have the identity of the purchase of equipment, but the substantive content of the purchase of equipment suppliers such as the choice of the specific requirements of the equipment, the conditions of the purchase contract negotiations by the lessee enjoy and exercise, lessee leasing object is essentially the purchaser. , Is a finance lease extension of loans and trade and technology updates in the new integrated financial instry. Because of its extension of loans and combination of features, there is a problem in leasing companies can recycling, treatment of leasing, and so the financing for the enterprise credit and secured the main requirement, it is very suitable for SME financing. In addition, the leasing of sheet financing, not reflected in the financial statements of the enterprise liability, does not affect the credit status of enterprises. This multi-channel financing needs of SMEs in terms of it is very beneficial.

Leasing and financing lease of a traditional nature of the difference is: traditional lease to the tenant leasing the use of objects of the time rent, and finance lease financing costs to the tenant occupying the time of rental. The market economy develops to a certain stage and the adaptation of a strong financing, in the 1950s in the United States have a new type of trading, as it adapted to the requirements of modern economic development, in the 60 to 70 the rapid development in the world, and today has become a business update equipment one of the main means of financing, known as the "sunrise instry." China in the early 1980s after the introction of this operational modalities for over 10 years has been the rapid development, compared with developed countries, the advantages of leasing is far from being played out, the market potential is huge.

[Edit] the main characteristics of the leasing
The main characteristics of the leasing is: the ownership of objects as leasing is the lessor in order to control the risk of the tenant rent reimbursement taken a form of ownership, at the end of the contract could eventually be transferred to the lessee, the lease purchase items from lease people choose, maintenance from the tenant responsible for the lessor to provide financial services only. Rent calculation principles are: to lease the lessor objects based on the purchase price, occupied by the lessee to the lessor of funds based on time, according to a mutually agreed rental rates. It is essentially dependent on the traditional leasing financial transactions, is a special kind of financial instruments.

[Edit] the type of lease financing
1. Simple financing lease

Financing lease is a simple, by the lessee choose to purchase the rental property, the lessor on the lease project through risk assessment after the rental lease to the lessee the use of objects. Throughout the lease period the lessee does not enjoy the right to use the title, and is responsible for repair and maintenance of leasing objects. The lessor's lease is good or bad thing without any liability, equipment depreciation in the tenant side.

2. Leveraged lease financing

Leveraged leasing practices similar to syndicated loans, is a specialized leasing to large-scale projects with the tax benefits of lease financing, mainly led by a leasing company as a trunk, and for the lease of a very large project financing. First set up a leasing company from the operation of the main institutions - a project-based fund management company set up projects to provide more than 20% of the total amount of funds, and the remaining part was the main source of funds banks and social absorb idle idle funds, the use of 100 percent enjoy low tax benefits "in the eight Bo" leverage for the leasing project large amount of funds. The remaining financing and leasing practices are basically the same, but because of the complexity of the contract covers a wide range and even greater. As can enjoy tax benefits, operating norms, comprehensive benefits, and recovery of rent safe, low-cost, and are generally used for aircraft, ships, communications equipment and large complete sets of equipment lease financing.

3. Commissioned by the Financial Leasing

Is a way to have the funds or equipment entrusted to non-bank financial institutions in the financing lease, the lessor is also the first client, the second is the trustee of the lessor at the same time. The lessor to accept the client's money or lease of the subject matter, according to the client's written by the client designated for the lessee of the leasing business. In the subject of the lease term lease of the property of the client, the lessor only charges, not to take risks. Such leasing commissioned a major characteristic is not to lease the right to operate the enterprise, "by the right" business. E-commerce is on the lease by lease rental as a business platform.

The second is the lessor or lessee commissioned by the lease purchase of a third person, the lessor under the contract to pay the purchase price, also known as commissioned by the lease purchase financing.

4. Project finance leasing

Lessee to project their own property and to ensure efficiency, and the lessor signed a finance lease contract, the lessor to the lessee of the property and other projects without recourse to the proceeds, we can only rent charged to the project's cash flow and profitability to determine. The seller (that is leasing goods manufacturers) through their holding leasing companies to promote their procts in this way, and expand market share. Communications equipment, medical equipment, transportation equipment, or even the right to operate highway can be used this way. Others, including the return of leasing, also known as sale and leaseback financing leasing; financing to leasing, also known as the financing to leasing.

[Edit] the risk of lease financing
Finance leases from the risk of many uncertain factors, is multifaceted and interrelated, in the full understanding of the operational activities of the characteristics of various risks can be comprehensive, scientific analysis of risks to formulate corresponding measures. The risk of financing leasing main categories as follows:

(1) proct market risks. In the market environment, regardless of the financing lease, loan or investment, as long as the funds used to purchase equipment or to carry out technological transformation, first of all, should consider leasing equipment procts market risks, which need to know to sell the procts, market share rate and occupancy, proct trends in the development of the market, the consumption structure and the mentality of the consumers and consumption capacity. If these factors are not fully understand, the survey are not careful, and may increase the market risk.

(2) financial risks. For the leasing of a financial nature, financial risks throughout the entire business activities. The lessor, the biggest risk is that the lessee is also rent capacity, it has a direct impact on the operation of leasing companies and survival, therefore, the risk of also rent from the project began, it should be cause for concern.

Currency also have risks, especially international payments, methods of payment, payment date, time, the remittance channels and means of payment options improperly, will increase the risk.

(3) Trade risk. For the leasing of a trade properties, the risks of trade negotiations to orders from the acceptance testing there is a risk. The merchandise trade in the modern development of a relatively complete, the community is also supporting the establishment of corresponding institutions and preventive measures, such as a letter of credit, transport insurance, commodity inspection, commercial arbitration and the risk of credit counseling have taken precautions and remedial measures, but because people's awareness and understanding of the risks of different degrees, and some means of a commercial nature, coupled with the inexperience of the management of enterprises and other factors, all of these instruments have not been used, making trade risk still exists.

(4) technical risks. One of the benefits of lease financing before other enterprises is the introction of advanced technology and equipment. In the actual course of the operation, or advanced technology, advanced technology is mature, mature technology for the legal rights and interests of others, is an important risk a technical reasons. Serious, e to technical problems so that equipment in a state of paralysis. Other risks include the economic environment, force majeure, and so on.

[Edit] the accounting treatment of lease financing
[Edit], the tenant on the accounting treatment of lease financing
1, the start of the lease accounting treatment

At the start of the lease, the tenant will usually be the start of the lease rental assets in the original book value of the minimum lease payments and the present value of the lower of the two leased assets as recorded value of the minimum lease payments as a long-term payables recorded value, and the difference between the two records is not recognised financing costs. However, if the assets of the leasing assets of the enterprise small proportion of the total, the tenant may be the start of the lease in the minimum lease payment records of assets and long-term rent payments. This time, the "proportional" not usually refers to fixed assets financed by leasing the lessee total assets total less than 30% (including 30%). Under such circumstances, rent for the financing of long-term assets and the determination of the amount e, the tenant may, at its option, which can be used minimum lease payments, and can also be used leasing assets in the original book value of the minimum lease payments and the present value of the two in the lower. Then what "leasing the original book value of assets" refers to the start of the lease rental, as reflected in the accounts, the book value of the leased asset.

Lessee in the calculation of the minimum lease payments at the current value, if the lessor that the interest rate implicit in the lease, the lessor should be used as the interest rate implicit in the discount rate, otherwise, shall be stipulated in the lease contract interest rate as the discount rate . If the lessor's interest rate implicit in the lease and rental rates stipulated in the contract are not available, it should be used over the same period interest rates on bank loans as the discount rate. Which is implicit in the lease rates, in the inception of the lease, the minimum lease payments and the present value of the unsecured portion of the resial value of the current value of assets and equivalent to the original book value of the discount rate.

2, the initial direct costs of the accounting treatment

Initial direct costs refer to the lease negotiations and the signing of the lease agreement occurred in the course of the lease can be directly attributable to the cost of the project. Lessee in the initial direct costs usually have stamp ty, commission, attorney fees, travel expenses, such as the costs of negotiations. Lessee in the initial direct costs should be recognised as an expense in the current period. Accounts for its handling: debit "management fees" and other subjects, credited to "bank" and other subjects.

3, no finance charge assessed

In the finance lease, the lessee to the lessor to pay the rent, include the repayment of principal and interest in two parts. Lessee to pay rent, on the one hand to rece long-term payables, on the other hand, while not confirmed by the leasing costs for a certain method to confirm the current financing costs, the first rent (that is, initially matching each rental payment) Under the circumstances, the lease term is the first phase of rent paid no interest, should only rece the long-term payments, not to confirm the current financing costs.

Not sharing in the finance costs, the lessee should be used to calculate certain way. According to the guidelines, the lessee can be used in real interest rates, the straight-line method can also be used and the number of years of combined law. In using the effective interest method, in accordance with the inception of the lease is a lease assets and liabilities are recorded based on the value of different financing costs assessment rate options are also different. No finance charge assessed specific divided into the following types:

(1), leasing assets and liabilities to a minimum lease payments accounted for the present value of value to the investor and the interest rate implicit in the lease for the discount rate. Under such circumstances, investors should be the interest rate implicit in the lease for the assessment rate.

(2), leasing assets and liabilities to a minimum lease payments for the present value of recorded value, and to lease contract provides for the interest rate as the discount rate. In such circumstances, should be stipulated in the lease contract as the rate of assessment rates.

(3), leasing assets and liabilities to the original book value of the leased asset accounted for the value of the lessee does not exist resial value guarantees and preferential purchase right to choose. In such circumstances, should be re-calculation of the cost-sharing rate financing. Financing cost-sharing rate refers to the inception of the lease, the minimum lease payments equal to the present value of lease assets in the original book value of the discount rate. In the lessee or related to the leased asset resial value of the third-party security situation, and the similar, the end of the lease, not recognised all the financing costs should be shared End, and lease liabilities should also be reced to zero.

(4), leasing assets and liabilities to the original book value of the leased asset accounted for the value of the lessee does not exist guaranteed resial value, but there is preferential option to purchase. In such circumstances, should be re-calculation of the cost-sharing rate financing. At the end of the lease, not recognised all the financing costs should be shared End, and lease liabilities should also be reced to zero.

(5), leasing assets and liabilities to the original book value of the leased asset value accounted for, and the existence of the lessee guaranteed resial value.

Under such circumstances, the cost-sharing should be re-financing rate. Related to the lessee or third parties on the resial value of leased assets as security has been provided or not at the end of the lease renewal and to pay a penalty of circumstances, the end of the lease, not recognised all the financing costs should be shared End, and lease liabilities should also be reced to the guaranteed resial value, or to be paid by the breach.

Lessee shall pay each of the rent shall be the amount of rent paid, debit "long-term payables - to finance leases," subjects, credited to "bank" subjects, if payment of rent, which includes compliance costs, At the same time debit should be "manufacturing costs", "management fees" and other subjects. At the same time should be recognized in accordance with the current amount of the finance charge, debit "financial costs" subjects, credited the "no finance charge" subjects.

4, the leased asset depreciation Provision

Tenants should finance the lessee Provision for depreciation of fixed assets, should address two main issues:

(1), depreciation policy

Provision for asset depreciation, lease, the tenant should be its own assets Provision line depreciation method. If the lessee or third parties relating to the leased asset security has been provided, should be credited for the amount of depreciation on fixed assets, and the inception of the lease accounting resial value after decting the value of the balance. If the lessee or third parties relating to the leased asset resial value of the security has been provided, the total amount of depreciation should be credited for the start of the lease value of fixed assets recorded.

(2), the depreciation period

Identify the leased asset depreciation period, should be in accordance with the lease contract. If reasonable certainty that the lessee at the end of the lessee will obtain ownership of the leased asset, the lessee can be identified with all of the assets of the remaining useful life, and should therefore be the start of the lease to lease the remaining useful life of assets as depreciation period; If you can not reasonably determine whether the lease to the lessee at the end of the lease ownership of the assets to be made to the lease period and the remaining useful life of the leased asset in the shorter of the two as the depreciation period.

5, the accounting treatment of compliance costs

Many types of compliance costs, rent for the financing of fixed assets improved expenditure, technical advice and service charges, fees should be increased staff training credited to the extension of sharing costs, debit "long-term prepaid expenses," and "accrued expenses" , "manufacturing costs", "management fees" and other subjects, the fixed assets regular maintenance, insurance, etc. can be directly charged to expense in the current period, debit "manufacturing costs," and "operating expenses" and other subjects, credited to "bank deposits, "wait until the subjects.

6, or the accounting treatment of rent

Since the rent or the amount of uncertainty, unable to adopt a rational approach to its system for sharing, in the actual event, debit "manufacturing costs," and "operating expenses" and other subjects, credited to "bank" and other subjects.

7, at the end of the lease accounting treatment

At the end of lease, the tenant on the lease is usually the disposition of the assets of three circumstances:

(1), the return of the leased asset. Debit "long-term payables - to finance leases," and "accumulated depreciation" subjects, credited "fixed assets - fixed assets financed by leasing all" subjects.

(2), renewable lease concession assets. If the lessee to exercise the right to choose renewable concession, the lease shall be deemed to have been made the presence of the corresponding accounting treatment. If no expiry of renewal, to the lessor under the lease contract to pay a penalty, debit "operating expenses" subjects, credited to "bank" and other subjects.

(3), stay purchase the leased asset. In the lessee enjoy preferential purchase right to choose, purchase price paid, debit "long-term payables - to finance lease," credited "bank" and other subjects at the same time, will be fixed assets from "all fixed assets financed by leasing" Details Details of the other subjects into subjects.

E. 急求一篇关于中小企业融资担保的英文文献

In order to assure cost recovery and a more equitable distribution of costs of solid waste services, many local governments have removed their solid waste operations from the General Fund, where the cost of waste management is often bundled with other general service costs, and started accounting for solid waste management services as a separate "enterprise fund." Effectively, governments have started viewing solid waste management services as a separate cost center with its own capital program and system of fees and charges to allow for the cost center to operate on a stand alone basis.

An enterprise fund for governmental activities is a self-sustaining cost center that operates similar to private business operations. The primary purpose of establishing the fund is to isolate all solid waste revenues and expenditures for purposes of accountability. Costs are clearly identified and recovered, and citizens can better understand the full cost of the solid waste management system.

Under an enterprise fund, all system revenues are deposited in the enterprise fund and pledged to the payment of system obligations, including administration, debt service, operations, maintenance, development, renewal and replacement of system components, provide for closure and post-closure funds, and, in some cases, provide for rate stabilization amounts. The accounting of an enterprise fund is segregated from all other community obligations and operations, including the General Fund. The accrual basis of accounting is used for enterprise funds, which matches revenues with expenses and reflects long-term commitments. Enterprise funds recognize accrued interest and depreciation as periodic expenses.

ENTERPRISE FUND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE MECHANISM

An Enterprise Fund is an alternate mechanism for local governments to demonstrate financial assurance that may be allowed on a case-by-case basis. This mechanism allows local governments to arrange satisfactory financial assurance within their governmental structure. For an enterprise fund to provide proper financial protection several conditions must be met. A specific portion of the fund must be dedicated to the closure and/or post-closure care of a specific facility, and the amount assured must be tied to the cost estimates for that facility. To provide security over time and ensure funds are readily available the monies from the enterprise fund must be dedicated to closure and/or post-closure care and deposited into a mechanism offering protection "equivalent to" a trust fund.

An Enterprise Fund mechanism requires the accrual of funds similar to a trust fund. On each anniversary of the establishment of the fund, the balance must be increased by at least the amount that would be deposited in a trust fund. The fund must be fully funded, equal to the current closure and/or post-closure cost estimate(s) when the facility closes.

To demonstrate to NDEQ that an enterprise fund satisfies the regulations, several pieces of documentation must be prepared and submitted to NDEQ.

To indicate that the governing body accepts the obligations and requirements of the regulations an originally signed resolution with the following criteria must be provided to NDEQ:
a of the formally adopted resolution directing that the enterprise fund be established with separate accounts or reserved (restricted) funds specifically for closure and/or post- closure care;
that the governing body recognizes the financial responsibility for closure and post-closure of the landfill and agrees to comply with Title 132, Chapter 8 financial assurance regulations and expresses its commitment to meet its financial obligations for closure and post-closure of the landfill;
that the governing body directs the City/County Treasurer or Chief Financial Officer to deposit and retain the funds set aside for closure and post-closure and maintain those funds to be used to pay only closure and post-closure care costs of the landfill;
that the funds shall be and remain inviolate against all other claims, including claims of the city/county or the governing board or the creditors thereof, it being the intent of the resolution that the financial assurance mechanism established will provide equivalent protection to a trust fund;
that the assured amount of funds will be available in a timely manner for closure and/or post-closure care of the landfill;
that the payments from the mechanism shall be made by the county/city treasurer or chief financial officer, as required by the Director of Public Works for the payment of closure and/or post-closure activities of the landfill as identified in the approved closure and/or post-closure plans;
that payments into the reserved accounts will be made annually according to the "pay-in" formula for trust funds in Title 132;
that the governing body authorizes NDEQ to direct the county/city treasurer or chief financial officer to pay the closure or post-closure costs if NDEQ determines the owner/operator has failed, or is failing, to perform closure or post-closure according to the approved closure or post-closure plan(s) and the county/city treasurer or chief financial officer is obligated to comply if so directed; and
that the local government will provide annual cost estimates and documentation as described in Number 3 below.
To demonstrate to NDEQ that the appropriate depository mechanism within the enterprise fund has been established, a letter from the county/city treasurer or chief financial officer must be submitted to NDEQ annually. The letter must state that the depository mechanism has been created and that he/she intends to comply with the following conditions:
The funds deposited into the closure/post-closure accounts will be used exclusively to finance closure and/or post-closure care and will remain inviolate against all other claims, including any claims by the owner/operator, the local government's governing body, and the creditors of the owner/operator and its governing body;
the funds deposited will be invested according to the laws of the State and the county/city treasurer or chief financial officer will use investment discretion similar to a trustee; and
the governing body authorizes NDEQ to direct the county/city treasurer or chief financial officer to pay closure or post-closure care costs, under the resolution described above, in a timely manner, if so directed.
To demonstrate that the local government has complied with the terms of the resolution and Title 132, Chapter 8, certification from an authorized official such as the city manager, public works director, or city/county clerk must be submitted annually, within 30 days of the date of the resolution, to NDEQ with the following criteria:
that the payment into the accounts has been made and where those funds are held;
the current account balance of the closure account and the post-closure account;
the formula used for determining the pay-in amount; and
annual cost estimate updates for inflation.

In addition, the local government must submit the most recent comprehensive annual financial report for the local government, including the enterprise fund accounts with adherence to the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 18 (Accounting for Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Care Costs).

Disclosures should include:
the type of requirements (closure, post-closure, and/or remedial action);
the source of the requirements (Nebraska Administrative Code (Title 132-Integrated Solid Waste Management Regulations, the Nebraska Environmental Protection Act, and the Integrated Solid Waste Management Act);
the name of the specific facility covered;
the corresponding cost estimates;
the amount of closure, post-closure, or remedial action liability recognized at the balance sheet date;
The estimated remaining costs not yet recognized;
The estimated landfill capacity and useful life in years; and
The financial assurance method being used.

The comprehensive annual financial disclosures will most likely be included in the financial section as a footnote to the annual financial statements and must conform to Government Accounting Standards Board Statement # 18.

Proced by: Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 98922, Lincoln, NE 68509-8922; phone (402) 471-2186. To view this, and other information related to our agency, visit our web site at www. deq.state.ne.us.

还有http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/regulations/Title14/AppendixA/faforms/ciwmb144.doc

http://www.finance.gov.ab.ca/publications/insurance/companies.html

F. 急求一篇关于小微企业信用贷款的英文文献,要有中文翻译!!!急急急急急啊!!!

关于中国小微企业信贷发展文献综述
一.引言 小微企业在我国经济发展中发挥着越来越重要的作用。据统计,目前我国小 微企业数量已占到全国企业总数的99%以上,涵盖了国民经济的所有行业,它们对GDP的贡献率超过60%,对税收的贡献率超过50%,并提供了80%的城镇就业岗位,俨然成为国民经济的重中之重。 然而,资金紧缺、融资困难却一直制约着小微企业的发展壮大。一方面小微企业受自身规模小、固定资产少、会计制度不健全等问题困扰,不能给银行提供充足的抵押品和银行需要的相关材料;另一方面,管理不规范、制度不健全、信息不透明、信用不足也是制约小微企业从银行获得贷款的最大障碍。 以此为背景,笔者尝试对该领域内主要贡献者的观点及建议进行归纳,并梳理其理论逻辑,力求理解小微企业,进而提出对于信贷的建议。具体讲,从小微企业产生、发展和变迁的全过程看,它的特殊性究竟是什么?我们如何将其引导到一种理想的未来状态?大致从哪几方面着手?具体的应对措施及建议是什么?本文期望能为人们进一步寻求上述问题的答案提供一些有益的视角。 本文对文献的综述基本上按照论述对象的顺序转变安排进程。围绕企业,银行及政府三方面论述小微企业面临的现状及困境,对于整体的局势以及趋势有一个立体的了解并来提出部分建议。尽管文献的视角各不相同,但都是基于改善中国小微企业面临的困境,夯实发展基础的初衷。
二.小微企业面临的信贷困境及原因 融资渠道狭窄,融资困难。小微企业由于在投资规模、技术含量、竞争实力等方面处于弱势地位,获得和利用政策信息的渠道不通、能力不强,在融资方面难以享受与大中型企业的同等待遇[1]。目前小微企业融资渠道主要有银行、小额贷款公司、担保公司以及民间借贷等四种途径。即使国家出台相关优惠政策支持小微企业融资,但基于融资成本、审批流程的考虑,小微企业或更倾向于通过亲友借贷来解决融资需求,然而,资金规模却相当有限。根据田耘在经济研究导刊中发表的文章指出,国家统计局抽样调查的3.8 万家小微工业企业经营状况显示,仅有 15.5%的小微企业能够获得银行贷款,年资金缺口近300亿,近80%的小微企业面临资金紧张[2]。尽管微小企业融资呈现出“渠道多元化、来源社会化、行为市场化”的趋势,但总体规模偏小,资金偏紧,条件偏严。小微企业为了避免资金链断裂,不得不转向民间借贷。虽然民间贷款形式较多,但贷款利息高,条件苛刻,小微企业因为资金缺乏举步维艰,其中不少企业处于倒闭、停产、半停产状态,老板频频“跑路”、人心浮躁。
三.小微企业会计代理风险管理 作为一种有效的会计解决方案和新型的社会性会计服务项目,会计代理被越来越多的小微企业所青睐。然而,根据陈军所述,在会计代理过程中,各个相关主体都想使自己的利益得到最大化,于是就产生了各主体间的利益博弈关系[3];同时,会计代理制度不完善、委托人与会计代理机构之间信息不对称、会计代理机构进入门槛低、从业人员业务水平不高等原因的存在,使得会计代理给相关主体带来了多方面的风险:给小微企业带来财务管理风险和经营管理风险,给会计代理机构带来信誉风险,给相关客户带来经济利益风险,给国家带来税收征缴风险。那么如何加强小微企业会计代理风险管理,
四.基于银行视角的小微企业信贷 我国目前小微企业贷款的开展并不理想,除了极少数银行由于天时地利人和的原因成功走上规模效益道路之外,大部分银行都陷入了进退两难的境地。我国金融机构开展小微企业贷款真正实现盈利的不多,而把微贷业务作为自己核心业务的金融机构更是少之又少,那么如何真正使小微企业从银行等信贷机构获得资本,创造盈利呢? 目前,充分利用供应链和小微企业的特点开发而成的“供应链金融”模式成为解决小微企业融资难和商业银行增加新盈利渠道的双赢选择。杨海平,冯敏等认为,在供应链金融业务中,如何进行风险管理,从而有效控制和防范风险,是取得成功的关键所在[5]。而在供应链金融的风险管理中,信用风险是最为重要的问题,而且随着信用交易规模的扩大,信用风险越来越大。目前,供应链金融业务发展时间不长,根据彭凯,向宇的研究可以推得,商业银行对于此类业务信用风险的管理和控制尚未形成一套行之有效的方法,更没有完善的专门适用于供应链金融产品的小微企业信用风险评价体系[6]。因此,建立一套适用于基于供应链金融的小微企业信用风险评价指标体系是目前迫切需要解决的问题。 基于供应链金融的小微企业信用风险评价是商业银行为了从总体上分析小微企业的信用风险,不仅分析小微企业过去的信用和财务状况,同时分析小微企业未来的现金流和财务状况,以及小微企业所处供应链系统环境中的利益相关者对其信用风险的影响,以便掌握更多的资料,对小微企业的信用风险作出更加合理、公正的评价,以保证银行信贷的安全性,并有针对性的对小微企业信贷过程中的风险进行有效控制[7] 。 建立一套适合供应链金融下的小微企业的信用风险评价体系,对小微企业来讲,有利于小微企业合理分析和评价自身的综合实力,通过不断改善经营管理,提高自身的资信级别,便于商业银行等金融机构按照企业的经营管理水平和信用状况给予资金支持;对银行机构来讲,可以为商业银行确定贷款风险程度和信贷资产风险管理提供重要的依据,提高小微企业违约成本,从而降低信贷风险[8];同时为监管部门的监管提供参考依据。 笔者认为,银行等信贷机构在以人为本的业务发展理念基础上,应该尽量将一些环节规范化、制度化、标准化,特别是一些大型银行,可以凭借自己的技术优势,尝试建立和完善银行自身的信用评分模型和数据信息库,进行小微企业贷款的发放,这也是将来的趋势。 五.政府在解决小微企业信贷难题中的作用 小微企业在国民经济发展、就业问题解决、城镇化推进、区域差距缩小等方面具有重要的作用,但是面临融资难、融资成本高的困境。尤其是最近我国部分民营经济发达地区出现民间借贷利率飙升、民间借贷纠纷增加、小微企业融资困境恶化等问题,引发了各方关注。政府在其中该起什么作用,这是一个亟待回答的问题。从世界各国小微企业信贷的实践来看,大量的政府干预并没有取得明显的效果,甚至出现了“好心办坏事”的结果,那么政府应该怎么介入,补贴怎么花,这是关键。
现笔者总结了以下几个建议:
(一)信贷基础设施的完善
1. 信息环境的完善。一方面,对于关系型借贷而言,目前较为成功的小微企业信贷主要是依赖于社会资本。社会资本的形成以及社会资本在软信息生产上具有明显的规模收益递增效应,这意味着政府的介入是必要的。另一方面,缺乏真实可信的财务报表是小微企业信息不透明的主要表现[9]。
税务、审计等部门可以考虑根据不同行业的特征设计小微企业的会计标准,设定简化的、标准化的会计科目和流程[10]。
2. 法律环境的完善。我国在民间借贷方面的立法也几乎是一篇空白。首先要从法律上对合法与不合法的民间借贷加以界定,特别是重新界定非法吸收公众存款、非法集资和正常的民间融资等概念的界限,从而为民间借贷提供合法化的平台,推动民间借贷的阳光化。其次,通过法律的方式明确主要合法民间借贷的定义、借贷主体双方的权利与义务、契约条款形式、交易方式等。第三,尽快从市场准入(包括注册资本金额度、从业资格认证)、产权结构、经营业务种类、规模与区域范围、监管、退出等方面对各类合法民间借贷中介加以规范。
(二)产业组织政策
政府的金融行业产业组织政策会深刻影响银行信贷技术选择、激励机制安排,从而影响小微企业的信贷可得性。首先,就规模而言,应该重视地方性小银行的发展,因为这些银行更容易形成适应于微型企业信贷需求特征的信贷技术创新和内部组织结构[11],在这一方面比传统大型银行具有比较优势,因此其市场定位不同于传统大型银行。所以,“由大银行服务大企业、小银行服务小企业”的理念基本上形成了共识,通过多层次的金融规模结构来满足不同规模层次企业融资需求的观念深入人心。但是,具体到政策层面,这种理念在实现的过程中并不通畅。这在一定程度上与产权结构有关。汪兴隆也在文中驳“大中型商业银行天然不适合小微企业金融服务”这一观点,并进行了详尽的论述[12]。
因此,笔者认为,应该鼓励一些在小微企业信贷方面经营能力突出的优秀社区银行以银行集团公司的模式实现跨地区经营,促进成功的小微企业信贷经营理念、技术与组织结构的推广,这可以在更大范围内更好得为小微企业的信贷服务。其次,在促进小微企业信贷的组织政策上,最核心的是要促进竞争。放宽小微金融机构的市场准入门槛,组建足够多的小微金融机构,促进小微企业信贷市场的竞争是产业组织政策的关键。人为抑制规模扩张、地域扩张来迫使银行对小微企业进行借贷的政策并不一定有效,促进充分竞争,才能真正解决小微企业信贷难的问题。

(三)放松小微金融机构的规制
1.要放宽小微金融机构的准入条件[13]。大量发展地方性的小微金融机构,是形成充分竞争的地方小微企业信贷市场的前提,是民间借贷规范化的主要途径,也是解决小微企业信贷难的关键措施。
2.要适当放松对小微金融机构的监管,可适当放宽“只贷不存”类金融机构在信息披露、会计准则、风险控制乃至资本充足等方面的监管标准,降低小微企业金融服务成本。
3.在紧缩的宏观调控中要避免误伤小微金融机构和小微企业,通过结构性的政策放松对小微企业的信贷。
4.要放松利率管制[14]。微型企业信贷的单位成本以及风险偏高,人为压低利
率导致贷款收益无法弥补其成本,直接制约了微型企业信贷的供给。鉴于微型企业较高的资本回报率,覆盖成本和风险的市场化利率设定机制是商业化小微企业信贷的前提条件。同时,需要引入弹性利率制度安排,利率随借款人的风险、次数而调整,有助于降低银行经营风险和形成对小微企业的动态激励。 六.总结 在国内外复杂的经济形势下,中国多数小微企业经营状况不好,收益微薄,困难重重。小微企业关乎国计民生,关乎实体经济的健康发展。本文结合文献,分析了当前中国小微企业信贷发展中存在的各方面问题及原因,并提出了部分建议,希望其通过不断改善经营管理,提高自身的资信级别,便于商业银行等金融机构按照企业的经营管理水平和信用状况给予资金支持;对银行机构来讲,可以为商业银行确定贷款风险程度和信贷资产风险管理提供重要的依据,提高小微企业违约成本,从而降低信贷风险;同时为监管部门的监管提供参考依据。支持小微企业健康发展,对于中国经济克服国际金融危机影响,保持平稳较快发展,具有重要的战略意义。

英语:
A summary of the development of literature China Small and micro businesses credit
I. Introction Small and micro businesses plays a more and more important role in China's economic development.According to statistics, at present, the number of China'sSmall and micro businesses have been accounted for more than 99% of the total number of enterprises, covering allsectors of the national economy, their contribution to the GDP rate of more than 60%, the contribution of the tax rate is more than 50%, and provide 80% of urban jobs, has become a national priority among priorities economy.However, the shortage of funds, financing difficulties has restricted the development of Small and micro businessesgrow. On the one hand Small and micro businesses by itssmall scale, less fixed assets, the accounting system is not perfect and other problems, not to the bank to provide relevant materials need adequate collateral and bank; on the other hand, nonstandard management, system is not perfect, information opaque, insufficient credit also is the biggest obstacle to obtain loans from banks to small and micro enterprises. Taking this as the background, the author tries to summarize the opinion and suggestion to the main contributor to the field, and analyzing its theoretical logic, and strive to understand the Small and micro businesses, and then puts forward suggestions for credit.In particular, the whole process of development andevolution from micro enterprises, look, what is theparticularity of it? How can we be directed to an ideal future state? To roughly from what aspects? What is the counter measures and suggestions for specific? To provide some useful perspective this paper further hope for people seeking answers to the above questions. This paper reviewed the documents in accordance with the order ofthe object basically change the arrangement process.Around the three aspects of enterprises, banks and government discusses the status quo and difficulties Small and micro businesses, for the overall situation and trendshave a solid understanding of and to put forward some suggestions. Although the perspective of literature each are not identical, but are improving China Small and micro businesses face difficulties based on the original intention,firm the development foundation.
Two. Facing Small and micro businesses creditpredicament and cause the narrow channels of financing,financing difficulties. Small and micro businesses e to a weak position in the scale of investment, technology,competition and so on, access to and use of policy information channel is obstructed, ability is not strong,financing difficult to enjoy equal treatment with [1] in large and medium sized enterprises. At present Small and micro businesses financing channels mainly has four ways banks,small loan companies, Guarantee Corporation and private lending. Even if the state issued the relevant preferential policies to support Small and micro businesses financing,but the financing cost, the approval process based on the consideration of Small and micro businesses, or more inclined to friends and relatives lending to solve the financing demand, however, the size of funds is verylimited. According to Tian Yun in the economic research guide in the published article pointed out, the National Bureau of statistics sampling survey of 3.8 thousands of small micro enterprise management status, Small and micro businesses only 15.5% able to obtain bank loans, financing gap of nearly 30000000000 years, Small and micro businesses near 80% face financial strain [2]. Although the financing of small enterprises showing a "channel diversification, socialization, marketization of sourcebehavior" trend, but the overall scale is small, the fund is tight, strict conditions. Small and micro businesses in order to avoid the fund chain break, had to turn to private lending. Although the form of more folk loans, but loanshigh interest, harsh conditions, Small and micro businessesbecause of lack of funds difficult, many enterprises are closed down, stop proction, semi shutdown state, the boss frequently "Run away", impetuous.
Three. Small and micro businesses accounting agency risk management as an effective accounting solutions and newsocial accounting services, accounting agents are more and more Small and micro businesses favor. However,according to Chen Jun said, in the process of accounting,the related subject all want to make their own interests to maximize, and thus the game among the interests of subjects between [3]; at the same time, between accountingagency system is not perfect, the principal and theaccounting agency information asymmetry, accountingagency enters a doorsill low, staff service level not higherreasons, the accounting agency risks in many aspectsrelated to the subject: bring the financial management risk and operational risk management to Small and micro businesses, brings credit risk to accounting agency, bring economic benefits to the customer risk, brought to the country tax collection risk. So how to strengthen the Small and micro businesses accounting agency risk management,
Four. The credit Small and micro businesses banks based on China's current development Small and micro businesses loans are not ideal, apart from a few banks e to the right place at the right time

G. 急!!!请问谁有关于Corporate Finance企业创业融资渠道的英文文章真的很感谢

Corporate finance
Corporate finance is an area of finance dealing with the financial decisions corporations make and the tools and analysis used to make these decisions. The primary goal of corporate finance is to maximize corporate value while recing the firm's financial risks. Although it is in principle different from managerial finance which studies the financial decisions of all firms, rather than corporations alone, the main concepts in the study of corporate finance are applicable to the financial problems of all kinds of firms.

The discipline can be divided into long-term and short-term decisions and techniques. Capital investment decisions are long-term choices about which projects receive investment, whether to finance that investment with equity or debt, and when or whether to pay dividends to shareholders. On the other hand, the short term decisions can be grouped under the heading "Working capital management". This subject deals with the short-term balance of current assets and current liabilities; the focus here is on managing cash, inventories, and short-term borrowing and lending (such as the terms on credit extended to customers).

The terms Corporate finance and Corporate financier are also associated with investment banking. The typical role of an investment banker is to evaluate investment projects for a bank to make investment decisions.

Capital investment decisions
Capital investment decisions[1] are long-term corporate finance decisions relating to fixed assets and capital structure. Decisions are based on several inter-related criteria. Corporate management seeks to maximize the value of the firm by investing in projects which yield a positive net present value when valued using an appropriate discount rate. These projects must also be financed appropriately. If no such opportunities exist, maximizing shareholder value dictates that management return excess cash to shareholders. Capital investment decisions thus comprise an investment decision, a financing decision, and a dividend decision.

The investment decision
Main article: Capital budgeting
Management must allocate limited resources between competing opportunities ("projects") in a process known as capital budgeting. Making this capital allocation decision requires estimating the value of each opportunity or project: a function of the size, timing and predictability of future cash flows.

[edit] Project valuation
In general, each project's value will be estimated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation, and the opportunity with the highest value, as measured by the resultant net present value (NPV) will be selected (see Fisher separation theorem). This requires estimating the size and timing of all of the incremental cash flows resulting from the project. These future cash flows are then discounted to determine their present value (see Time value of money). These present values are then summed, and this sum net of the initial investment outlay is the NPV.

The NPV is greatly influenced by the discount rate. Thus selecting the proper discount rate—the project "hurdle rate"—is critical to making the right decision. The hurdle rate is the minimum acceptable return on an investment—i.e. the project appropriate discount rate. The hurdle rate should reflect the riskiness of the investment, typically measured by volatility of cash flows, and must take into account the financing mix. Managers use models such as the CAPM or the APT to estimate a discount rate appropriate for a particular project, and use the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to reflect the financing mix selected. (A common error in choosing a discount rate for a project is to apply a WACC that applies to the entire firm. Such an approach may not be appropriate where the risk of a particular project differs markedly from that of the firm's existing portfolio of assets.)

In conjunction with NPV, there are several other measures used as (secondary) selection criteria in corporate finance. These are visible from the DCF and include payback period, IRR, Modified IRR, equivalent annuity, capital efficiency, and ROI.

See also: list of valuation topics, stock valuation, fundamental analysis

[edit] Valuing flexibility
Main articles: Real options analysis and decision tree
In many cases, for example R&D projects, a project may open (or close) paths of action to the company, but this reality will not typically be captured in a strict NPV approach. Management will therefore (sometimes) employ tools which place an explicit value on these options. So, whereas in a DCF valuation the most likely or average or scenario specific cash flows are discounted (see John Burr Williams: Theory), here the “flexibile and staged nature” of the investment is modelled, and hence "all" potential payoffs are considered. The difference between the two valuations is the "option value" inherent in the project.

The two most common tools are Decision Tree Analysis (DTA) and Real options analysis:

The DTA approach attempts to capture flexibility by incorporating likely events and consequent management decisions into the valuation. In the decision tree, each management decision in response to an "event" generates a "branch" or "path" which the company could follow. (For example, management will only proceed with stage 2 of the project given that stage 1 was successful; stage 3, in turn, depends on stage 2. In a DCF model, on the other hand, there is no "branching" - each scenario must be modelled separately.) The highest value path (probability weighted) is regarded as representative of project value
The real options approach is used when the value of a project is contingent on the value of some other asset or underlying variable. (For example, the viability of a mining project is contingent on the price of gold; if the price is too low, management will abandon the mining rights, if sufficiently high, management will develop the ore body. Again, a DCF valuation would capture only one of these outcomes.) Here, using financial option theory as a framework, the decision to be taken is identified as corresponding to either a call option or a put option - valuation is then via the Binomial model or, less often for this purpose, via Black Scholes; see Contingent claim valuation. The "true" value of the project is then the NPV of the "most likely" scenario plus the option value.

[edit] Quantifying uncertainty
Further information: Monte Carlo methods in finance
Given the uncertainty inherent in project forecasting and valuation, analysts will wish to assess the sensitivity of project NPV to the various inputs to the DCF model. In a typical sensitivity analysis the analyst will vary one key factor, while ceteris paribus holding constant all other inputs. The sensitivity of NPV to a change in that factor is then observed (calculated as Δ NPV / Δ factor). For example, the analyst will set annual revenue growth rates at 5% for "Worst Case", 10% for "Likely Case" and 25% for "Best Case" - and proce three corresponding NPVs.

Using a related technique, analysts may also run scenario based forecasts so as to observe the value of the project under various outcomes. Under this technique, a scenario comprises a particular outcome for economy-wide, "global" factors (exchange rates, commodity prices) as well as for company-specific factors (revenue growth rates, unit costs). Analysts may also plot these results to proce a "value-surface" (or even a "value-space"), where NPV is a function of several variables. Here, extending the analysis, key inputs in addition to growth are also adjusted, and NPV is calculated for the various scenarios.

A further advancement is to construct stochastic or probabilistic financial models (as opposed to the traditional static and deterministic models). For this purpose, the most common method is to use Monte Carlo simulation to analyze the project’s NPV . Here, the cash flow components that are (heavily) impacted by uncertainty are simulated, mathematically reflecting their "random characteristics". The simulation proces several thousand trials (in contrast to the scenario approach above) and outputs a histogram of project NPV. The average NPV of the potential investment - as well as its volatility and other sensitivities - is then observed. (Typically, an add-in such as Crystal Ball is used to run simulations in spreadsheet based DCF models.)

Here, continuing the above example, instead of assigning three discrete values to revenue growth, the analyst would assign an appropriate probability distribution (commonly the triangular distribution). This distribution - and that of the other sources of uncertainty - would then be "sampled" repeatedly so as to generate the several thousand realistic (but random) scenarios, and the output is a realistic, representative set of valuations. The resultant statistics (average NPV and standard deviation of NPV) will be a more accurate mirror of the project's "randomness" than the variance observed under the traditional scenario based approach.

[edit] The financing decision
Main article: Capital structure
Achieving the goals of corporate finance requires that any corporate investment be financed appropriately. As above, since both hurdle rate and cash flows (and hence the riskiness of the firm) will be affected, the financing mix can impact the valuation. Management must therefore identify the "optimal mix" of financing—the capital structure that results in maximum value. (See Balance sheet, WACC, Fisher separation theorem; but, see also the Modigliani-Miller theorem.)

The sources of financing will, generically, comprise some combination of debt and equity. Financing a project through debt results in a liability that must be serviced—and hence there are cash flow implications regardless of the project's success. Equity financing is less risky in the sense of cash flow commitments, but results in a dilution of ownership and earnings. The cost of equity is also typically higher than the cost of debt (see CAPM and WACC), and so equity financing may result in an increased hurdle rate which may offset any rection in cash flow risk.

Management must also attempt to match the financing mix to the asset being financed as closely as possible, in terms of both timing and cash flows.

One of the main theories of how firms make their financing decisions is the Pecking Order Theory, which suggests that firms avoid external financing while they have internal financing available and avoid new equity financing while they can engage in new debt financing at reasonably low interest rates. Another major theory is the Trade-Off Theory in which firms are assumed to trade-off the Tax Benefits of debt with the Bankruptcy Costs of debt when making their decisions. An emerging area in finance theory is Right-financing whereby investment banks and corporations can enhance investment return and company value over time by determining the right investment objectives, policy framework, institutional structure, source of financing (debt or equity) and expenditure framework within a given economy and under given market conditions. One last theory about this decision is the Market timing hypothesis which states that firms look for the cheaper type of financing regardless of their current levels of internal resources, debt and equity.

[edit] The dividend decision
Main article: The Dividend Decision
In general, management must decide whether to invest in additional projects, reinvest in existing operations, or return free cash as dividends to shareholders. The dividend is calculated mainly on the basis of the company's unappropriated profit and its business prospects for the coming year. If there are no NPV positive opportunities, i.e. where returns exceed the hurdle rate, then management must return excess cash to investors. These free cash flows comprise cash remaining after all business expenses have been met.

This is the general case, however there are exceptions. For example, investors in a "Growth stock", expect that the company will, almost by definition, retain earnings so as to fund growth internally. In other cases, even though an opportunity is currently NPV negative, management may consider “investment flexibility” / potential payoffs and decide to retain cash flows; see above and Real options.

Management must also decide on the form of the distribution, generally as cash dividends or via a share buyback. There are various considerations: where shareholders pay tax on dividends, companies may elect to retain earnings, or to perform a stock buyback, in both cases increasing the value of shares outstanding; some companies will pay "dividends" from stock rather than in cash. (See Corporate action.) Today it is generally accepted that dividend policy is value neutral seeModigliani-Miller theorem).

H. 急求关于中小企业融资问题的英文文献

Small Business Loan 101
Essentials of Small Business Loan

From Naurys Marte, for About.com

As a small business owner, your most difficult task is finding the money to operate your business. Taking the necessary steps to prepare for a small business loan can minimize the difficulty. Learn what you need to know to clinch the loan deal.

Banks and other lending institutions cite risk factors as their main reason for turning down small business loan requests from startup businesses. Yet, you can still get a loan for your business by proper preparation.

Avoid the common error of thinking you can start with grants from the government and community agencies. It is even more unlikely than getting the money from your own savings, family, friends, or a bank.

The main requirements of attaining a small business loan are your personal credit history, business plan, experience, ecation, and feasibility of the business you are starting or expanding.

The most important task to obtain a small business loan is preparing a business plan. The business plan needs to show the lender that providing you with a small business loan is a low-risk proposition. Your business plan must answer the questions a lending institution would ask. These questions usually are:

How much money do you need?

If you are starting a business, this should be included at least in the start-up capital estimate. Accuracy is important, so request enough money to invest wisely.

What are you going to do with the money?

You will have to provide, in detail, the designated use of every dollar requested. A small business loan is often needed for: operations (new employees, marketing, etc.), assets (equipment, real estate, etc.), or to pay off business debts.

When will you repay the small business loan?

Explain in detail how this small business loan will serve as a stepping-stone for your business. You will need to convince the lender (with your financial statements and cash flow projections) that you are able to repay the loan through the expected long-term profitability of your business.

What will you do if you don't get the loan?

Let lenders know that rejection will not discourage you from starting or growing your business. You want to portray a confident and determined personality and you will try lender after lender until you receive the money you need to get your business moving.

As a small business owner, you will need a certain degree of fortitude. Be confident and proud of your venture. Let lenders know you are in control and know what's best for you and your business. Understand that lending institutions need to make loans. But if you don't get one, don't get discouraged. Ask the lender why you didn't get the small business loan. Learn from the answer, move on, and try other lenders.

The Women's Venture Fund is a resource for women in business who need money and training to expand their venture for New York or New Jersey businesses. To learn more about the Women's Venture Fund call 212-563-0499 or visit www.womensventurefund.org.
Small Business Loan Resources

Getting a Small Business LoanSmall Business Banking 101New Rules of Small Business Financing
Small Business Information Resources

Email Guide: Darrell ZahorskyArticles Reprint PermissionSubmit Articles to Small Business
Related Articles

* Getting A Small Business Loan - Making A Winning Business Loan Presentation
* How To Get A Small Business Loan
* Get a Business Loan - How to Apply for a Small Business Loan
* Before You Apply for a Business Loan
* Business Loans - Preparation for Application for Business Loans

阅读全文

与公司融资方面的英文文献综述相关的资料

热点内容
外汇平台周六周日可以出金吗 浏览:962
法院审理泛亚金融有限公司 浏览:486
不终止确认的金融资产 浏览:337
中金所期权产品多少杠杆 浏览:425
长春市住房公积金贷款额度 浏览:528
尼日利亚奈拉汇率美元黑市 浏览:660
欧元与美金汇率 浏览:787
大淘客改佣金 浏览:323
同方股份2018第四季度业绩 浏览:383
哪项不是邮储银行个人客户理财产品系列 浏览:55
深圳中赢财富金融公司 浏览:694
济南金融机构 浏览:870
银行间理财区别 浏览:972
兰州黄河000929股票 浏览:983
财政部干预汇率的方式 浏览:798
金融服务质量的构成要素 浏览:473
9月5日汇率日元 浏览:957
日币兑换怎么兑换人民币汇率 浏览:462
网络开户怎么调佣金 浏览:140
起步股份涨幅预计 浏览:661